Network
With demand for streaming services soaring globally, infrastructure demands on streaming platforms are mounting. And key to delivering high-quality streams to users all around the world is the content delivery network (CDN).
Using a commercial CDN has traditionally been the obvious choice. But with streaming platforms growing to massive scale (and in need of greater control over their infrastructure), custom built CDNs are an increasingly popular and effective choice.
In this blog post we compare the pros and cons of both commercial and purpose-built CDNs and outline three key steps involved in building your own.
A content delivery network (CDN) is a group of distributed servers that deliver video streams from locations close to end users. By caching content near users, CDNs reduce strain on origin servers, improving load times and keeping performance consistent. There are two ways to deploy a CDN: via a commercial CDN provider or by building a CDN in-house.
Outsourcing a CDN involves entering a contract with a commercial CDN provider. CDN providers operate global networks of edge servers used to cache and deliver their clients’ media streams. They’re typically ‘plug-and-play’ solutions, meaning you can get set up quickly with everything you need (security, analytics, load balancing, managed network operations, service level agreements), with no specialist expertise required.
Key benefits include:
Rapid deployment with global reach and automatic scaling to handle traffic spikes
Low upfront costs with minimal capital expenditure compared to in-house solutions
Managed security and performance backed up by service level agreements (SLAs)
Reduced operational overhead so you can focus on platform development
Third-party CDNs can be extremely convenient, especially for teams that do not already have network infrastructure expertise in-house. The price for that convenience is control. Third-party solutions offer limited scope for customization, which means you won’t have the opportunity to optimize your CDN to your unique performance needs.
This limited flexibility extends to other areas too. For platforms with strict regulatory requirements, the lack of control and oversight over data handling can risk complicating compliance. And whilst most commercial CDNs provide hosting options in a variety of locations, you won’t have complete control over your points of presence (PoPs) which means your network can’t be fully optimized to your target audience.
Key limitations include:
Fewer opportunities to customize routing, caching, and peering agreements
Risk of vendor dependence, restricting your ability to switch providers
Limited control over how (or where) your data is processed
PoPs limited to each individual vendor’s portfolio
Commercial CDNs are a great choice for small-to-medium sized streaming platforms with limited access to technical resources. For example, an emerging OTT platform will benefit from being able to launch quickly without heavy upfront costs and then scale with demand. Similarly, cloud communications platforms and video applications requiring global performance consistency for multi-region live events or cloud video chats can depend on commercial CDN services to ensure consistent quality of experience.
Building a CDN involves deploying and operating your own global infrastructure. This can be done by buying your own bare metal hardware to run in your own data center, leasing bare metal cloud servers, or leasing virtualized compute from a public cloud provider.
You can build out a CDN infrastructure using any of these compute types. The difference lies in the level of control each offers and the level of responsibility you have over the deployment and underlying hardware maintenance.
| Environment | Customer control | Customer responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| On-premises | Full control over hardware, network, operating system, storage, security, and applications. | Everything: physical facilities, power/cooling, hardware lifecycle, networking, operating system, security, patching, backups, and applications. |
| Bare metal cloud | Full control over the physical server, operating system, storage configuration, network setting, security controls, and applications. | Operating system installation/patching, security and backups, monitoring, applications (provider handles data center and physical hardware maintenance). |
| Virtualized cloud | Control over virtual machines, operating system, applications, and some network/security settings. | Operating system, application configuration, patching, backups, in-guest security (provider manages the physical hardware, virtualization layer and data center). |
For the purposes of this example, we will discuss building a CDN on bare metal cloud. You won’t be responsible for procuring hardware or contracting colocation facilities, but you will maintain complete control over your underlying hardware.
Key benefits include:
Ability to tailor your hardware, routing and caching according to your platform’s needs
Establish complete control over your chosen points of presence
Optimize for ultra-low latency or niche geographic/regulatory requirements
More control over costs (achieve cost efficiency at scale for stable workloads with high traffic volumes and reduce overall spend)
If you need a highly optimized CDN architecture, then building your own will give you the required control over your hardware, locations, and costs. But, in this case, that control comes with technical, operational (and sometimes financial) overheads. You’ll need to hire experts with the relevant technical and operational expertise, and your team will be responsible for 24/7 monitoring and upgrades - as well as demand and procurement planning.
Key limitations include:
A need for specialized expertise in networking, caching, routing and security
24/7 monitoring and incident response are your responsibility
PoPs being limited to vendors’ data center locations (note: adopting a multi-vendor approach widens access)
Building a CDN is the best choice for platforms with specific requirements. If you’re dealing with a highly specialized type of content - adaptive bitrate video streaming (ABR), for instance - it’s unlikely that your needs will be met using a generalized, commercial CDN. In cases like these, a custom-built CDN designed specifically to optimize the delivery of segmented video files will offer better performance and scalability.
Mega-scale global streaming platforms like Netflix also tend to build in-house CDNs. Having the ability to optimize your CDN hardware and network architecture at a granular level is the best way to maintain performance quality at scale. It’s also the best way to avoid congestion bottlenecks on shared networks that could risk degrading stream quality. And whilst upfront costs are higher when building a CDN in-house (especially if you choose to buy your own hardware), over time the economies of scale balance out the cheque.
Netflix, for example, operates a custom-built global CDN called Netflix Open Connect (OCA) which is based on a foundation of thousands of purpose-built server appliances deployed within internet exchange points in significant Netflix markets.
Not every streaming platform is going to fit neatly into the build or buy camp. And in these cases, it’s worth considering a hybrid CDN strategy. In this model, you can build and operate your own CDN in regions where you experience consistently heavy viewership, where traffic patterns are well understood and scale justifies the investment. Then, for unpredictable demand spikes, smaller markets (or as a safety net during outages), tap into a third-party CDN solution. This hybrid approach combines cost efficiency and flexibility - allowing platforms to minimize long-term expenses without sacrificing performance or coverage.
Building your own CDN is a significant systems and operations effort. But with careful planning, the long-term performance and efficiency gains can be huge. If you’re ready to consider building your own CDN, consider these three central foundations:
There are four key components that make up any CDN architecture: Origin servers (the primary server that receives encoded video segments), edge servers (geographically distributed servers close to end viewers), a control plane (for orchestration, configuration and monitoring), and routing mechanisms (e.g, a GeoDNS to route client requests to the nearest or best-performing edge server).
This type of architecture can be deployed on several different infrastructure setups - virtual machines, bare metal, or a hybrid approach with a portion of the CDN architecture implemented on bare metal (for its performance stability and cost efficiency at scale) and another in a virtualized cloud environment (for its rapid and instant scaling capabilities). The CDN software sits on top of your origin and edge servers offering a full set of content delivery features including load balancing, persistent storage engines, and caching rules.
It’s also important to evaluate your concurrent viewership and factor in contingency compute for any unexpected demand spikes. If you’re combining bare metal and virtualized infrastructure as part of your CDN architecture, this is when that virtualized compute would kick in. In the streaming world, demand spikes are inevitable around popular events (think sporting events like the SuperBowl, for instance), so this is a critical step.
An important step when building a CDN is to identify the best geographical locations for your origin servers and edge servers. Origin servers should be located as close to production as possible to reduce the round-trip time for data requests. Edge servers should be located as close to viewers, with specific PoPs chosen based on audience hubs, anticipated growth in particular regions, and common traffic patterns.
If you choose to host your servers through an infrastructure-as-a-service provider, then available data center locations should be a key consideration. Partner with a vendor with data center locations close to your end users and consider taking a multi-vendor approach so you have access to a wider pool of data center locations.
It’s exactly the approach real-time video platform nanocosmos takes to ensure their real-time video streaming platform always delivers the highest quality content: “We collaborate with multiple partners and are continually seeking new partnerships to strengthen our position,” said Oliver Lietz, CEO of nanocosmos. “We chose bare metal from servers.com to widen our infrastructure provider list for our StreamCloud CDN and through the partnership we’ve been able to achieve better coverage in Europe, Asia and the United States.”
To avoid downtime or interrupted services, it’s important to build multiple levels of redundancy into your CDN architecture, including:
Server redundancy: Implement RAID, back up data on backup servers or storage devices, and use load balancing to distribute traffic across multiple servers
Geographic redundancy: Deploy multiple PoPs per region and ensure enough spare compute to absorb failover capacity so users aren’t impacted even if one PoP is lost
Network and routing redundancy: Use multiple DNS providers and multiple upstream ISPs per PoP to ensure users can always reach an edge server
Load redundancy: Ensure strict capacity limits for each region and PoP to avoid server overload cascades that could result in major failures
Recent cloud provider outages have made the need for redundancy even more present. Several large streaming platforms including Disney+ were impacted by the major AWS outage which occurred in October 2025, with users reporting difficulty accessing streams on the platform. Similarly, the outage impacted communications platforms like Slack, causing intermittent failures, failed message delivery, and login issues.
“Today’s massive AWS outage is a visceral reminder of the risks of over-reliance on two dominant cloud providers, an outage most of us will have felt in some way,” said Nicky Stewart, Senior Advisor at the Open Cloud Coalition.
Every streaming platform should be implementing a disaster recovery plan that includes robust redundancy measures to ensure fast recovery after an unplanned incident such as damage to the data hall, natural disasters, cyber-attacks, and server failure.
For many platforms, commercial CDNs remain a fast, low-risk way to achieve reliable content delivery. But as traffic volumes grow and requirements become more specific, a custom content delivery network can offer clear advantages. With the ability to fine-tune architectures and choose optimal PoPs, building your own CDN can ultimately become a strategic asset rather than a burden. With the right planning partners, the initial complexity can be overcome to unlock long-term performance and efficiency at scale.
Last updated: February 2026. This article was originally published to explore how to build your own CDN. It has been updated to include a broader strategic comparison between building in-house and outsourcing to a CDN provider.

Frances is proficient in taking complex information and turning it into engaging, digestible content that readers can enjoy. Whether it's a detailed report or a point-of-view piece, she loves using language to inform, entertain and provide value to readers.